A tweet by activist Aisha Yesufu has set off a storm on social media, comparing investigative journalist David Hundeyin to R. Kelly. In her critique, Yesufu acknowledged Hundeyin’s talent but argued that he is “deeply flawed and evil,” attributing his behavior to childhood experiences of religious fanaticism.
She claimed that Hundeyin seeks validation and has a habit of making accusations before searching for evidence to fit them. Additionally, she accused him of rehashing old investigations and presenting them as his own.
The tweet sparked mixed reactions, with some agreeing and others defending Hundeyin. Twitter user @hardicanute5 dismissed any notion of Hundeyin’s journalistic skill, saying, “I don’t even see any talent in him, just an obsessive drive to damage people he doesn’t like. Very soon he will attack Peter Obi with baseless accusations. Then the eyes of his defenders will clear.”
Another user, @valentionkingz, suggested that Yesufu herself was avoiding accountability for past political involvement, stating, “When you are done ranting and throwing tantrums to deflect from the main issue, come back and tell your own story. You participated in the 2012-2015 saga, why not own up and move on?”
Meanwhile, @Ouchng shifted the focus back to Yesufu, accusing her of being complicit in promoting the Buhari presidency and the Chibok kidnapping narrative. “Aisha, for promoting the Chibok kidnap saga and campaigning for the worst president in the recent history of Nigeria (Buhari), you are EVIL. Apologize for being used by APC and the US and move on,” the user wrote.
Hundeyin is no stranger to controversy. While he has gained a reputation for fearless investigative journalism, critics—like Yesufu—argue that his work is driven by personal bias rather than a commitment to the truth. His methods have come under scrutiny before, particularly when Oxford University severed ties with him in 2023 over allegations of misconduct at a book launch event.
Despite these criticisms, Hundeyin remains a significant figure in Nigerian journalism. Some believe his work is vital for exposing corruption and injustice, while others, as Yesufu suggested, see him as someone who sensationalizes issues for personal gain.
Meanwhile, Aisha Yesufu further escalated her attack, vowing that even after her death, Hundeyin would “not know peace” and that she would “haunt him every day of his life,” expressing a wish that he lives beyond 100 years. This strong statement amplified the intensity of the debate, with many weighing in on both sides.
Leave a Reply